We've had the Southall and Meadow debacle, however at least they did conduct research into the areas they alleged to have expertise. However Risdon came out of nowhere. On checking pubmed, I can only find one paper that relates to child abuse and it isn't a research paper it is a commentary paper. Risdon's expertise was nephrology - check it out yourselves. Yet he states to the press he has 20 years of experience researching sudden death of infants - if that is the case, how is it then that he has never published the findings of that research?
Risdon also went the academic route which calls into question his experience and training in pathology.
It's beginning to look more like the Charles Smith debacle by the day.
Thursday, 31 January 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment